[DVDFolks] Plans for Next version - Remove the (credited as) section from roles

[Doug Wright]

dlb wrote:

> Doug
>
> I appreciate your quick responses (and indulgence!) ....
>
> I explained the usefulness (to me) in my original post. I have 
> considered the limited length of the role field (from much practice 
> with DVDProfilerCast). I would say that in the majority of cases I 
> have experienced, it has not impacted on the role field (similarly 
> with "uncredited", "archival footage" etc). However, if it does, and 
> considering you now enable editing of fields before generating the 
> XML, it would be easier for the user to handle excess characters than 
> to type in the extra "(credit as XXXXXXX)"  or "(uncredited)" characters.
>
> David
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>DVDFolks mailing list
>DVDFolks at dougweb.org
>http://dougweb.org/mailman/listinfo/dvdfolks_dougweb.org
>
Since I haven't implemented the 'credited as', I think I might just 
leave it out then...

Anyone else got an opinion one way or the other on the (uncredited) etc?

-- 
Doug

Email:     doug at dougweb.org      Reclaim your inbox!: getthunderbird.com
Web:        www.dougweb.org      Rediscover the web!: getfirefox.com